data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60aa4/60aa4f2712ec51819e948b554a57e83a51fc3579" alt=""
I
read these books the first time a couple years ago. When the first real trailer was released I
admit to being a bit confused. I was
unsure if the trailer seemed so different because it was different or if I just
didn't remember the book that well. So
to prepare for the movie, I re-read Insurgent
the day before I saw it, technically I finished that afternoon before we did
see it, so to say it was fresh in my mind is an understatement. There were a lot of changes made to the
movie. You expect changes in book to
movie adaptations, it’s a way of life, and they can make or break a story. I was okay with most of the changes in the
movie. Let me explain, Insurgent had a LOT happening in
it. There was a ton of exposition and
information to absorb in the book and to try and get all of that in there with
all the different subplots in just 2 hours of movie and not have it be rushed
through at super speed it needed to be condensed. My honest opinion would be that they should
have split Insurgent into two movies,
since it had so much meat to it, and then only done the last one as one. Come on that would have been a huge change,
splitting something other than the last book.
Given we didn't get that I was happy with the movie. I LIKED IT!
I didn't LOVE it as much as some others but I wasn't disappointed in
it. It kept true to at least most of the
book and the story, unlike some adaptations.
The
acting was pretty much as we remember.
There were some intense stares and oh some comedic relief when it wasn't
expected. Never expected to laugh so
much at Peter when I hated him so much in the books. For me there was a bit too much CGI. The snake things that go into the divergent
to try and open the box that levitate them….not necessary. Why did you need to make it complicated
instead of just going with it and having them on the chair like the last
one. Keep some things familiar. The directors changed and you expected changes
in the style but a bit more consistency would have been nice.
So
that's all I really have that doesn't have spoilers. Now I want to discuss some of the changes and
my thoughts on them. First let me say
these are in no particular order, just how they come to me as I'm writing my
review.
Tris
and her emotional state. Her PTSD is
played down somewhat in the movie. She
was struggling with what she did to her friend.
She didn't want to hold a gun, much less use one, in the books but she
didn't seem to struggle with weapons in the movie as much, one small flinch at
holding a gun does not give the depth the book had through the entire
story. In the book she also became
reckless, stupid Dauntless adrenaline junkie reckless, which put a strain on her and Four. Speaking of Tris and Four's relationship
issues, I think they were better in the movie.
They seemed to be on more solid ground and not have as many bickering
moments like in the book because one wasn't being truthful, they just kinda had
these looks that seemed to say they understood.
I was conflicted at first because I wasn't sure if that would detract
from their relationship as a whole but after seeing it, for me it made their
connection that much more real and solid for me where it wavered for me in the
book some. Their relationship is still
new and fresh and to be constantly fighting each other with everything else
going on would not show them as a strong unit.
However, because they cut out most of their conflict it did cut out some
of their growth as characters.
One
of the things I'm most upset about them cutting was in Amity. Where Tris and Peter fight and she is
injected with the peace serum. Basically
Tris on some serious happy drugs. Why
didn't we get this scene where she was drugged out of her mind and so
hilarious? Her conversation with Four
during it in the book were great. It
would have given the audience a chance to see insecurities about them and
explain about the serums and being divergent.
Four has a theory that she is immune from all the serums but succumbed
to this one because she wanted to feel happy.
![]() |
See how happy she could have been! |
Which
leads me to the Candor truth scene. The
movie never showed that she could have withheld the truth if she wanted. That in the end even though she could lie,
she chose to be honest and get it out there that she killed her friend,
Will. That she told the truth even
knowing it would hurt people and herself.
It was a very powerful scene in the book and came a bit short of
emotional depth in the movie, showing more awkward than anything. This also continues with Christina and Tris!
They cut out all the stuff between them.
Where she hates her but then after the simulation suicides, which she
wasn't involved in, but I liked her seeing it first hand, she understands what
Tris meant about Will being unable to hear her and forgives her, which helps
Tris start to forgive herself. Big
emotional part. I think this cut some
real depth and emotion from the story and was saddened by it. Also taking back Dauntless headquarters was a
big thing to take back their home. Plus
paintball guns, always fun.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba0b6/ba0b66bc46d8b26dc5a37e7308b00b5ae2594969" alt=""
Speaking
of the attack, one of my other favorite parts was cut. Tris didn't get to shank Eric. WHY? It
showed she might still be struggling with her PTSD and not want to shoot people
but when her life was on the line or that of an innocent she was willing to act
to save them. Plus Eric was such a
douche. Also they never chose new
Dauntless leaders, which wasn't as big of a thing since people could easily see
who everyone was looking to. Tris and
Four did flip flops as to his mother/factionless. Tris was anti it in the book and Four was
willing to take a chance, but in the movie it was the opposite, which was only
slightly confusing to me. Also the
factionless have a huge headquarters type thing going on instead of small safe
houses all over, constantly moving. I totally get it for the movie, it makes
more sense to show the numbers and the overall visual feel of them in one
space.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f86a/0f86ad01d097017a22bcafdfe3c874dd153af5e3" alt=""
They
cut the rescue scene and the invasion together, for the movie I thought this
made a lot of sense. It flowed better
and given some of the subplots and things that were cut out to this point it
was the only thing that made sense. Though
again would have loved to see Tris and Christina work together again having
made up with one another, a good bonding experience. Again there was a lot happening in the book
and only two hours of movie. The rescue and such leads to the biggest issue I had
with the movie changes, and that was the ending. The end of the movie is with them showing the
message to everyone. Great that happened
in the book and it ended there. Allegiant picks up with a small group of
people, Tris/Fours group leaving, not the entire city leaving for the gates so
now I'm confused about the next movie.
But more than that, it seems like the factionless were good people. NO! In
the book after the invasion they start to take arms from the Dauntless quietly
and then turn them on them showing they are the new bosses in town. They don't want to work together but to rule
their way. It ends when the video is
played.
I'm
sorry if this is a bit of a spastic review.
I just wanted to get my thoughts out there and make note of some things
that changed be it good or bad. I'd love
to hear your thoughts on the book and movie versions. Share what you think about the overall movie,
the changes, are you planning to see Allegiant. I need to discuss this further.
Rating: 4
Stars